Telia deferred prosecution agreement and Coscom guilty plea over Uzbekistan bribery (2017)
- Resolution type
- Deferred prosecution agreement for Telia Company AB, guilty plea and sentence for Coscom LLC, and an SEC resolution 1,3
- Agencies
- DOJ Criminal Division Fraud Section and Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section, U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, and the SEC 1,2 3
- Foreign authorities
- Public Prosecution Service of the Netherlands (Openbaar Ministerie) and the Swedish Prosecution Authority 1
- Charges
- Conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA, one count against each company 1
- DOJ penalty
- US$274,603,972 for Telia, including a US$500,000 criminal fine and US$40 million criminal forfeiture paid on behalf of Coscom 1,2
- Dutch penalty
- US$274 million to the Openbaar Ministerie, credited by DOJ. Total criminal penalties US$548,603,972 1,2
- SEC amount
- US$457,169,977 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest, with credit for disgorgement paid in Sweden or the Netherlands and for the US$40 million forfeiture 1,2
- Admission
- "Telia admitted to participating in the charged conspiracy", as set out in the statement of facts in the DPA 2
The DOJ resolution
DOJ said Telia Company AB, a Stockholm telecommunications company and former issuer of US securities, entered a deferred prosecution agreement in connection with a criminal information charging conspiracy to violate the FCPA anti-bribery provisions 1. Coscom LLC, Telia's Uzbek subsidiary, pleaded guilty to a one-count information on the same charge and was sentenced by the court 1.
DOJ said Telia agreed to pay a US criminal penalty of US$274,603,972, which includes a US$500,000 criminal fine and US$40 million in criminal forfeiture paid on behalf of Coscom 1,2. Telia agreed to put in place internal controls and to cooperate with the continuing investigation 1.
DOJ said the companies did not voluntarily self-disclose 1. It said they received a 25 percent reduction off the bottom of the Sentencing Guidelines fine range for cooperation and remediation 1. DOJ said the lack of self-disclosure was the reason they did not receive more credit 1. The DOJ and SDNY releases do not state the DPA term or name a monitor 1,2. This page has not confirmed how the DPA ended.
Conduct described by DOJ
DOJ said that, according to the companies' admissions, Telia and Coscom paid about US$331 million in bribes to an Uzbek government official 1. DOJ described the official as a close relative of a high-ranking government official who had influence over the Uzbek body that regulated telecommunications 1.
DOJ said the payments were made on several occasions from about 2007 to 2010, including through a shell company that certain Telia and Coscom managers knew was beneficially owned by the official 1. DOJ said the bribes helped Telia enter the Uzbek market and helped Coscom gain telecom assets and keep operating 1. Prosecutors said the payments were wired through bank accounts in New York City 1.
DOJ said that in late 2012, after Swedish media reports, a Swedish criminal investigation and an internal Telia investigation had begun, certain managers considered an additional bribe 1.
Acting U.S. Attorney Joon H. Kim said the companies "have admitted to paying, over many years, more than $331 million in bribes" 1,2. The SDNY release says Telia's admission is set out in "the statement of facts set forth in the DPA" 2.
SEC and foreign resolutions
The SEC said on 21 September 2017 that Telia would pay US$457 million in disgorgement and that portions of the US amounts could be offset by payments overseas 3. The DOJ releases give the SEC figure as US$457,169,977 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest 1,2. The SEC release describes the DOJ criminal fine as "more than $508 million" 3. DOJ gives total criminal penalties of US$548,603,972, including the US$40 million forfeiture 1. The SEC release does not say whether Telia admitted or denied the SEC findings 3.
DOJ said Telia agreed to pay a US$274 million criminal penalty to the Public Prosecution Service of the Netherlands, which DOJ credited 1. DOJ said the SEC would credit disgorgement paid to the Swedish Prosecution Authority or the Dutch authority, up to half of the SEC total 1. This page does not cite the Dutch or Swedish decisions themselves.
Forfeiture actions
SDNY said the United States had filed civil complaints seeking forfeiture of more than US$850 million held in bank accounts in Switzerland, Belgium, Luxembourg and Ireland 2. SDNY said the funds are alleged to be bribe payments by VimpelCom, Telia and a third telecom company, or funds involved in laundering them 2. These are allegations in civil complaints. This page has not confirmed their outcome.
Common questions
Did Telia plead guilty?
No. Telia Company AB entered a deferred prosecution agreement 1. Its Uzbek subsidiary Coscom LLC pleaded guilty 1.
Did Telia admit bribery?
Yes, under the DPA. SDNY says "Telia admitted to participating in the charged conspiracy" in the statement of facts 2.
How much did Telia pay?
Combined penalties of US$965,773,949 to US, Dutch and Swedish authorities, according to DOJ 1,2.
Who was the Uzbek official?
DOJ does not name the official. It describes a close relative of a high-ranking Uzbek government official 1.
Rules and fees change. Check the official site linked above before you apply or pay. Spotted an error? Email [email protected] with the official link.
Sources
- U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs: Telia Company AB and Its Uzbek Subsidiary Enter Into a Global Foreign Bribery Resolution of More Than $965 Million for Corrupt Payments in Uzbekistan, release 17-1035 (21 September 2017)
- U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York: Global Telecommunications Company And Its Subsidiary To Pay More Than $965 Million In Penalties In Massive Bribery Scheme Involving Uzbek Official (21 September 2017)
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission: Telecommunications Company Paying $965 Million For FCPA Violations, release 2017-171 (21 September 2017)
Related
- Deferred and non-prosecution agreements explained
How U.S. deferred prosecution agreements and non-prosecution agreements work for companies, the Justice Manual factors, and what the company admits.
- FCPA resolutions explained
How U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act cases end: declinations, NPAs, DPAs, guilty pleas and SEC actions, with the statute, penalties and DOJ policy.
- VimpelCom FCPA resolution (2016)
VimpelCom and its Uzbek subsidiary Unitel resolved US and Dutch bribery cases in February 2016. Amounts, charges, admissions, monitor and status.
- Mobile TeleSystems (MTS) FCPA resolution (2019)
MTS and its Uzbek subsidiary KOLORIT resolved US bribery charges for US$850 million in March 2019. DPA, guilty plea, SEC order, monitor and extension.
- Ericsson FCPA resolution (2019) and 2023 guilty plea
Ericsson agreed to pay over US$1 billion in a 2019 FCPA resolution, then pleaded guilty in 2023 after DOJ found it breached the DPA. Terms and dates.